zoom in on elemental map of TaSi2 sample taken using EDS - it looks strikingly similar to the WDS map.
zoom in on elemental map of TaSi2 sample taken using EDS - it looks strikingly similar to the WDS map.

Analytical Alternatives to WDS for Elemental Analysis on SEM

Solving WDS Applications with Windowless EDS and micro-XRF on SEM

Many researchers use Wavelength Dispersive Spectroscopy (WDS) to overcome challenges such as elemental peak overlaps, low signal intensities or to perform analysis at low kV. 

Developments in EDS peak deconvolution routines in conjunction with modern windowless detectors and micro-XRF on SEM now mean that these challenges can be overcome without the disadvantages of WDS analysis. 

Continue reading to find out about light element detection & peak deconvolution, as well as trace element detection & X-ray line separation using alternative SEM-based analysis technologies. 

Overcoming the Limitations of Wavelength Dispersive Spectroscopy

Wavelength Dispersive Spectroscopy (WDS) is a long-established and highly trusted analytical technique in materials characterization.

WDS provides outstanding spectral resolution, enabling the reliable separation of overlapping peaks and precise elemental identification, even in complex sample matrices. Additionally, it provides a very high peak to background ratio, enabling the detection of overlapping elements present at low concentration levels. WDS based on a parallel beam optic additionally serves a strong light element efficiency making it the preferred choice for low acceleration voltage and low probe current for various applications fields.

However, these performance advantages come with considerable constraints. WDS acquires spectra sequentially, which fundamentally limits measurement speed compared with the simultaneous full‑spectrum acquisition of energy‑dispersive X‑ray detectors (EDS). In addition, WDS requires substantial user expertise to maintain optimal instrument alignment, select appropriate standards, and perform accurate quantification since the technique is intrinsically standards‑based and cannot operate in a standardless mode.

Modern windowless EDS detectors combined with a micro‑XRF source overcome the typical limitations of WDS and still deliver high analytical performance. This integrated approach offers a powerful, flexible, and cost‑efficient alternative for both routine and advanced materials analysis. It supports rapid, high‑throughput elemental mapping and full‑spectrum acquisition, with strong analytical sensitivity from micro‑XRF excitation and excellent light‑element detection from windowless EDS. Both technologies can be seamlessly integrated into existing SEM platforms and require far less calibration, alignment, and maintenance than WDS. They also support standardless quantification and eliminate consumables such as flow counter gases.

Windowless EDS 

Light Element Detection & Peak Deconvolution

By removing the detector window, absorption of low energy X-rays is drastically reduced, resulting in considerably enhanced sensitivity for light and ultra‑light elements.

When combined with modern multi‑segment detector architectures, large solid angles, and high count‑rate capability, windowless EDS delivers substantial gains in efficiency: typically, up to a factor of 3 for light elements and up to 16 for ultra‑light elements such as beryllium, when compared with conventional EDS systems.

In addition, simultaneous full‑spectrum acquisition enables fast measurements even at low accelerating voltages and beam currents. This makes windowless EDS an excellent choice for the analysis of beam‑sensitive material and high‑speed elemental mapping, as well as routine workflows where both throughput and accuracy are important.

Bruker has more than 20 years of experience and know-how in individual detector calibration and EDS peak deconvolution routines.

Application example

Windowless EDS vs. WDS for the Analysis of TaSi2

In this TaSi₂ sample containing inclusions of Si, separating Ta from Si can be challenging due to the small 28 eV offset between the energetic positions of the main SI-K and Ta-M lines.

While WDS can physically resolve overlapping peaks, modern EDS deconvolution routines can also separate Ta from Si but much more quickly. What takes minutes with WDS takes seconds with EDS.

 

EDS Spectrum Deconvoultion vs. WDS Spectrum Resolution for TaSi2

EDS spectrum of TaSi2 (1.6-1.9 keV section) with deconvolution of overlaps. (Resolution 75 eV @Si-Ka)
WDS spectrum of TaSi2 (1.6-1.9 keV section) resolving the overlaps. (Resolution <4 eV @Si-Ka)

EDS Map vs. WDS Map for TaSi2

EDS map with SE overlay. 20 kV, 2.8 nA, 600x450 px, 130 kcps, 30 min, online deconvolution, no filter.
WDS map with SE overlay. 20 kV, 18 nA, 600x450 px, 30 min per element, no filter.

The Light Element Performance of WDS, Without the Complexity

Using our QUANTAX EDS analytical system with the XFlash® 7100oval windowless EDS detector the elemental analysis and mapping of even light and ultra-light elements is possible in less time than it would take to perform WDS analysis.

If you are interested in learning more about the benefits of our windowless EDS detectors for your application contact a Bruker expert. 

The windowless XFlash® 7100oval detector has enhanced sensitivity to light and ultra-light elements. 
Micro-XRF on SEM

Trace Element Detection & Separation of X-ray Line Series 

Micro‑XRF on SEM combines efficient X‑ray excitation with simultaneous EDS spectral acquisition. This results in high sensitivity and a very low spectral background, enabling dependable trace‑element detection down to the lower ppm range.

Micro-XRF on SEM is most efficient for the mid- and higher elemental range and can therefore excite higher energy K- and L-lines more efficiently. These regions typically show far fewer peak overlaps than the low‑energy range. As a result, the ultra‑high spectral resolution traditionally associated with WDS is often not required for many applications. At the same time, the ability to excite the full X‑ray spectrum and observe multiple line families increases confidence that an element is truly present in the sample.

Application Example

Trace Element Detection with Micro-XRF on SEM

Detecting trace elements at the tens-of-ppm level can be challenging with conventional EDS. For example, NiO at 20 ppm and HfO2 at 40 ppm in glass may remain undetected because their weak characteristic signals are buried within the spectral background.

The superior sensitivity of micro-XRF on SEM, using the XTrace 2 micro-XRF source, enables the clear identification and analysis of these trace elements, extending the detection capabilities of SEM-based elemental characterization.

Micro-XRF spectrum of trace elements in a glass sample containing NiO (20 ppm) and HfO2 (40 ppm).
Application Example

Separation of X-ray Line Series in the High-Energy Range with Micro-XRF on SEM

Rare Earth Elements (REEs) frequently occur together in mineral samples, such as La, Ce, and Pr, resulting in severe peak overlaps in the low-energy region of conventional EDS spectra.

With the addition of XTrace 2 to the SEM, high-energy X-ray line families are visible even beyond 40 keV (e.g., the Nb Kβ line shown in the figure). In this high-energy range, the characteristic lines of individual REEs are well separated, eliminating the overlapping of peaks and enabling confident identification of rare earth elements, even at trace concentration levels.

Micro-XRF spectrum of monazite showing the clearly separated high-energy K-lines of La, Ce, and Pr (>30 keV) , which enable unambiguous identification of individual rare earth elements.

High-Throughput Trace Element Mapping

Using QUANTAX Micro-XRF with XTrace 2 the analysis and mapping of trace elements, and detection of separated X-ray lines, is possible in significantly less time than WDS analysis. 

If you are interested in learning more about the benefits of micro-XRF on SEM for your application contact a Bruker expert. 

Micro-XRF on SEM using the XTrace 2 secondary X-ray source in conjunction with an EDS detector. 

Enhance Your Analysis with Combined micro-XRF and EDS on SEM

Windowless EDS and micro-XRF complement each other and directly address key limitations of conventional WDS systems.

Together, they provide faster, more efficient, and more cost‑effective elemental analysis, delivering excellent sensitivity for both light‑element detection and trace‑element quantification.

Systems and detectors used:

Contact a Bruker Expert

If you are interested in learning more about our alternatives to WDS or how Bruker's detectors can benefit your application contact a Bruker expert.